Forgive me if you're already pregaming for the Emerald Bowl or have been waiting since May to see if heavyweight also-ran Dominick Guinn can recover from his loss to Eddie Chambers but I do believe ESPN's programming whiz kids are making a mistake tonight. Those are your programming options in prime time on ESPN and the deuce while the considerably smaller ESPNU gets one of the biggest early season college basketball games. The Butler Bulldogs are bringing their nationally ranked show to Carbondale for a mid major bonanza of hoopy goodness. Southern Illinois was the preseason darling of the mids but their horrific shooting has them at 5-5 entering tonight's game with the 16th-ranked Bulldogs. Their offense has always been problematic but their rebounding has taken a hit this season, which may explain why they can't win as often.
Butler and new coach Brad Stevens are poised for a return trip to the Sweet 16, maybe further. A.J. Graves and Mike Green are a splendid backcourt and the freshman Matt Howard has given them inside balance. They can shoot and score in bunches but have struggled a bit with the turnovers. Can SIU exploit that and pick up a big win to propel them into conference play?
Maybe so. SIU's struggles have done nothing to diminish their defense. They force turnovers on 28% of their opponent's possessions, which is why they went to the Sweet 16 as well last season. Butler will have to make the most of their opportunities offensively, which is why the return of Pete Campbell is so important. The sweet-shooting swingman hasn't played well in two games back from injury but could be a deciding factor if the Salukis shut down the big three.
The Salukis scored 88 points their last time out and another offensive performance like that would likely spell an easy win. Butler is better defensively than Western Kentucky, though, and SIU won't be staring at a bunch of wide-open threes. The addition of Wesley Clemmons to the starting five paid big dividends in that game, his scoring touch could play a role tonight.
However it breaks down, the game should be a fitting rematch of February's masterpiece between the two teams. It's a shame that more people won't get a chance to see it, but those that do get a post-Christmas treat.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-28-2007 @ 5:55PM
Terry Brennan said...
This "mid-major" label is an insult to a lot of great conferences. It is ESPN and a few other culprits who have set this whole thing up to try to make more money. Do you really think Northwestern,Providece,etc.,etc. are a typical "major team". What a joke.
Reply
12-28-2007 @ 6:06PM
JAlper said...
Terry - I agree with you, up to a point. Teams like Butler, St. Mary's and Southern Illinois are better than a lot of teams that play in more well-known conferences. Until the MVC, Horizon and WCC schools spend as much on sports as the Big East, Big 10 and others, though, there's an imbalance that makes the mid major label more than just media hype.
Reply
12-28-2007 @ 8:37PM
Terry Brennan said...
Josh, you missed my point, it is not money it is to use a simple marketing term "positioning" that sets up this kind of BS logic. There is no way that teams like Butler,Southern Illinois,Xaiver,Dayton,etc.etc., are not better than two thirds of the teams in each of the six or seven so called "major conferences". If most of these so called elite teams would have to play home and away games against the top tier of the so called mid-majors they would lose a lot of those games. In the end by labeling these teams as mid-majors you position them from the beginning as being inferior to the so called major teams. In reality there are only 3-4 really good teams in some of these so called major conferences and there might be 2-4 good teams in the so called mid-major conferences. It just depends on the talent pool in a given year. Remember, basketball(with maybe 5-7 good players is needed) is a lot different than football(with maybe 22-30 good players are needed.
Reply
12-28-2007 @ 8:54PM
JAlper said...
Terry - We're of like minds. Was just explaining why, for me, schools like Butler fit the mid major label. It makes it more impressive to me what Stevens, and Lickliter before him, have done because they don't have the same margin for error of bigger programs.
Reply
12-29-2007 @ 10:42PM
Terry Brennan said...
Josh, I just watched a so called "mid-major" team in Dayton destroy number 6 ranked Pitt by 25 points. I guess Billy Packard and the other big time cheerleaders will just explain away this defeat by saying they were tired or had a lot of injuries. What a bunch of bull. This "mid-major" label has got to go or the whole game of college basketball will be seen as bias and a joke.
Reply