OUR FANHOUSE TOOLBAR INTEGRATES THE LATEST SPORTS NEWS INTO YOUR WEB BROWSER AND INSTALLS IN SECONDS.
YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE TOOLBAR HERE.

NCAA Basketball

ESPN's Sports Reporters Differ on Don Imus

ESPN's panel discussion show The Sports Reporters had a discussion about Don Imus this morning that was notable for a few reasons.

The first is that the panel consisted of three white men (Mike Lupica, Mitch Albom and Bob Ryan) and one black man (John Saunders). Saunders was the only one of the four who thought Imus deserved to get fired for calling the Rutgers women's basketball team "nappy-headed hos." It would have been nice to hear a female perspective on the nasty way Imus described these young women.

Also interesting: Lupica is a longtime Imus friend who bizarrely referred to Imus's comment as "one offense" and added, "If I thought he was a racist I wouldn't have been going on his show for 25 years." Lupica might be right that Imus isn't a racist, but he's very, very wrong if he thinks Imus's offensive language was just "one offense."

And yet another interesting part of this is that Ryan also referenced his own history of offensive comments -- he was suspended by the Boston Globe in 2003 for saying Jason Kidd's wife should be smacked. Ryan had the best point about Imus's claims that he's "a good person who did a bad thing." Ryan said, "That is not true. He is a good person who has done hundreds, maybe thousands of bad things if he's refering to remarks of that nature, whether they're about gays or blacks or women or whatever. That's his shtick."

Previously at FanHouse:
Snoop Dogg: Don't Compare Me to Don Imus
Stuart Scott on 'Ho': 'I Didn't Say That It's a Good Thing'
Stuart Scott Says Calling a Woman a Ho Is 'Affectionate'
Annika Sorenstam: Don Imus? Rutgers? Never Heard of Them
Who's Worse, Don Imus or Billy Packer?

Related Articles

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)