Teams that slid off the bubble (or had their bubbles aggressively violated by an incompetent selection committee, as some would have you believe) spent much of today bitching and crying about being excluded from the tournament. And that's fine ... it's to be expected, it happens every year, and yes, it's true that some teams did get unfairly railroaded.But don't let it linger too long, alright? The NIT can be a valuable thing for a young basketball team, and if a team goes in there all mopey and plays with extended lower lips, they're missing an opportunity to grow their team.
I'll use West Virginia as an example, because I think they fit the profile pretty well. They're a young team, with just two seniors that play significant minutes, and the backups for those two guys are already in place. Making a deep run into the NIT would be way more valuable to this team than would be getting bounced in the first or second round of the NCAA. It's all about getting that tournament experience. One-and-done is a different feeling.
Remember a couple of years ago when the NIT filed an anti-trust lawsuit against the NCAA, because they mandated that if a team was invited to the NCAA Tournament, they had to accept? One of the guys who testified on behalf of the NIT was Bob Knight, who said he could envision circumstances where he'd rather his team played in the NIT than the NCAA. If there's no realistic chance of making a deep NCAA run, why not get a few more games of tournament experience?
And I know you'd like to think that your bubble team was going to make a run to the Final Four, but, and I'm sorry to have the be the one to tell you this, they weren't. If you were on the bubble to begin with, it's overwhelmingly unlikely that you'd even sniff the Final Four. Yes, there are cinderella teams every year. No, it wasn't going to be you.
So my advice to players and coaches would be to take a day or two, mope and weep, and then prepare for the NIT like it is the big dance. Lemons, lemonade ... that whole thing.


















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-12-2007 @ 8:52PM
jeremy said...
to add insult to injury, syracuse got a #2 seed and were placed in the south in the NIT. more lemonade!
Reply
3-12-2007 @ 9:06PM
Jim said...
Syracuse should boycott the NIT... nothing to gain really by participating.
Reply
3-12-2007 @ 10:11PM
The Monk said...
Jim and Jeremy are basically right. There's a reason NIT is referred to as Not In Tournament -- few teams do anything in the NIT and then progress the next season. Even the 2002 Orangemen who went to the NIT's semifinals had no real benefit, they won the '03 title thanks to their frosh and the upswing in their sophs (Carmelo, G-Mac, Edelin, Warrick, Pace) who meshed with superfrosh Anthony.
SU's omission is a complete travesty, and I detail why here.
Reply
3-12-2007 @ 10:15PM
The Monk said...
Jim and Jeremy are basically right. If I were Coach Boeheim, I'd give as much PT to my underclassmen as possible because the NIT is meaningless. I've been a diehard SU fan for 25+ years and barely watched in '02 when SU went to the NIT semifinals. This year it's worse, as I noted here, because SU got completely shafted this year.
Reply
3-13-2007 @ 6:45PM
Jaj8588 said...
Since Drexel was robbed of their bid to the big dance, here's hoping they show everyone what they're missing. GO DRAGONS!
Reply
3-15-2007 @ 11:15AM
KEVIN said...
SOME IDIOT HERE SAID SOUTH BAMA WOULD DESTROY SYRACUSE BECAUSE TICKET SALES WERE 3000 AS OF THE DAY BEFORE, WOUND UP 16,000+ SHOWED UP......BUT HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT BAMA, SYRACUSE PROVED LAST NIGHT THEY DON'T EVEN DESERVE BEING IN THE NIT'S, LET ALONE THE NCAAA'S...THE COMMITTEE WAS RIGHT AGAIN!!!
SHUT UP JIM BONEHEAD!!
Reply
3-15-2007 @ 11:10AM
kman said...
SYRACUSE DOESN'T EVEN BELONG IN THE NIT. TELL JIM BONEHEAD TO STOP CRYING AND GET A REAL SCHEDULE NEXT YEAR..KUDOS TO THE COMMITTEE FOR NOT INVITING THEM TO THE DANCE...WAY TO GO,LOVE IT
Reply